lawphil cases|lawphil net : Baguio BAR EXAMINATIONS ARCHIVE. BAR EXAMINATIONS 2022; November 20, . There are 62 Hotels close to Mohegan Sun in Uncasville Hotels Near Mohegan Sun Reviews: There are 26,001 reviews on Tripadvisor for Hotels nearby: Hotels Near Mohegan Sun Photos: There are 8,739 photos on Tripadvisor for Hotels nearby Nearest accommodation: 0.12 km:
lawphil cases,Lawphil Project is a website that provides access to Philippine legal information, such as Supreme Court decisions, laws, and rules. It also features case updates, legal updates, .The Lawphil Project - About Us. ABOUT US. Lawphil is a legal web site project of .
1987 CONSTITUTION OF THE REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES. PREAMBLE. .BAR EXAMINATIONS ARCHIVE. BAR EXAMINATIONS 2022; November 20, .
The Lawphil Project. ACTS - PHILIPPINE STATUTES. 1972; Act No. 3952 .The Lawphil Project. Government Agencies. Office of the President; Office of the Vice .The Lawphil Project. Click on the year to read the full text of the decision.[ G.R. No. 242900, June 08, 2020 ] EDWIN L. SAULO, PETITIONER, VS. PEOPLE .
lawphil cases lawphil netThe Lawphil Project - Year 2021 Supreme Court Decisions. YEAR 2021 - .
The Lawphil Project - Year 2020 Supreme Court Decisions. YEAR 2020 - PHILIPPINE JURISPRUDENCE. October: November: December: July: August: September: .
The Lawphil Project. CASE NUMBER CASE TITLE; G.R. No. 193305 January 27, 2021 Republic of the Philippines vs. Banal na Pag-aaral Phil., Inc. Separate Concurring Opinion
lawphil casesIt had yet to decide a case involving government interference with the employment choices of religious groups, so the United States Supreme Court, instead, discussed cases .lawphil netThe Lawphil Project. JULY 2021 - PHILIPPINE JURISPRUDENCE. CASE NUMBER CASE TITLE; G.R. No. 231512 July 28, 2021 Rico De Asis y Dado vs. People of the Philippines .
The Lawphil Project. CASE NUMBER CASE TITLE; G.R. No. 235725 September 28, 2022 Joel A. Tapia vs. Ga2 Pharmaceutical, Inc., : G.R. No. 205597The Lawphil Project. . CASE NUMBER CASE TITLE; G.R. No. 239746 November 29, 2021: Limcoma Labor Organization (LLO)-PLAC vs. Limcoma Multi-Purpose Coop. .2. That the person assaulted is a person in authority or his agent. 3. That at the time of the assault the person in authority or his agent (a) is engaged in the actual performance of official duties, or [b] that he is assaulted by reason .This Appeal 1 assails the March 1, 2019 Decision 2 of the Court of Appeals (CA) in CA-G.R. CR-H.C. No. 10254, which affirmed with modification the November 21, 2017 Judgment 3 of the Regional Trial Court (RTC) of Olongapo City, Branch 73, convicting Melford Brillo y De Guzman (accused-appellant) in Criminal Case No. 160-2011FC. The Facts.The Case. This ordinary appeal challenges the Decision 1 dated April 26, 2018 of the Court of Appeals (CA) in CA-G.R. CR-HC No. 08616, which affirmed the Judgment 2 dated July 15, 2016 of the Regional Trial Court (RTC) of Manila, Branch 9 in Crim. Case Nos. 11-288374-78, finding accusedappellant Christian Manuel y Villa (accused-appellant .2. In consideration of a price, reward or promise. 3. By means of inundation, fire, poison, explosion, shipwreck, stranding of a vessel, derailment or assault upon a street car or locomotive, fall of an airship, by means of motor vehicles, or with the use of any other means involving great waste and ruin. 4.The Lawphil Project. MARCH 2022 - PHILIPPINE JURISPRUDENCE. CASE NUMBER CASE TITLE; G.R. No. 194310 March 29, 2022: Felicitas Aguilar Bollozos vs. Heirs of Luisa Abrio Vda. De Aguilar represented by Florentino. G.R. No. 203876 March 29, 2022: ABS-CBN Corporation vs. Clara L. Magno:
The Lawphil Project - Year 2022 Supreme Court Decisions. YEAR 2022 - PHILIPPINE JURISPRUDENCE. October: November: December: July: August: September: . International Court of Justice International Criminal Court Collection of International Cases Treatises Agreements & Conventions United Nations World Trade Organization World .
The Case. Before this Court is a Petition for Review1 under Rule 45 of the Rules of Court assailing the Decision2 and Resolution3 of the Court of Appeals in CA-G.R. SP No. 126498 dated 15 January 2013 and22 July 2013, respectively. The Decision dismissed the Petition for Certiorari, Prohibition and Mandamus with Prayer for the Issuance of a .
In Criminal Case No. 216-V-17, finding accused CHRISTIAN CADAJAS y CABIAS GUILTY of violation of Sections 4 (a) and 3 (b) and (c) (5) of RA 9775 and he is hereby sentenced to suffer the penalty of reclusion temporal and to pay a FINE of One Million Pesos. SO ORDERED. 21. On appeal, the CA affirmed the RTC's judgment.[ G.R. No. 247429, September 08, 2020 ] JAIME ARAZA Y JARUPAY, PETITIONER, VS. PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES, RESPONDENT. D E C I S I O N. PERALTA, C.J.: This is a petition for review on certiorari filed by petitioner Jaime Araza y Jarupay (Araza), praying for the reversal of the December 17, 2018 Decision1 of the Court of Appeals (CA) in CA .The case is by no means novel. In fact, it is on all fours with Republic v. Science Park of the Philippines, Inc., G.R. No. 237714 dated November 12, 2018.49 That case involved the same parties, issues, attendant circumstances, and pieces of documentary and testimonial evidence. The only distinction between the two cases hinges on the identity .D E C I S I O N. HERNANDO, J.: This Petition for Review on Certiorari 1 assails the September 5, 2014 Decision 2 of the Court of Appeals (CA) in CA-G.R. SP No. 128497, which set aside the August 28, 2012 Decision 3 and November 15, 2012 Resolution 4 of the National Labor Relations Commission (NLRC) declaring herein respondents Gavino L. .
Subsequently, the respective pre-trial hearings in Civil Case Nos. 0033-C (in 2000), 0033-D (in 2000), and 0033-E (in 2003) were terminated. Meanwhile, while pre-trial hearings were being conducted in the other cases, the PCGG filed, on various dates, motions for partial summary judgment and/or judgment on the pleadings, in all of the subject cases except .As civil liability, the accused Reynaldo Valencia y Vibar is hereby ordered to pay the heirs of Celedonio Jaquilmo the following amounts, to wit: (1) [₱]50,000.00 as civil indemnity; (2) [₱]58,000.00 as actual/compensatory damages/burial expenses; (3) [₱]168,394.64 for loss of earning capacity; and.Both failing to obtain reconsideration from the CA Decision, 48 RNB and RMPC filed the subject petitions, docketed as G.R. No. 236331 49 and G.R. No. 236332, 50 respectively. The Arguments of RNB and RMPC. RNB asserts that the CA erred in declaring RMPC as a labor-only contractor.
It was consolidated with G.R. Nos. 211559 and 211567 through this Court's June 25, 2014 Resolution. 32. On July 3, 2014, PROGUN filed a Verified Petition for Contempt 33 alleging that the Philippine National Police violated this Court's April 8, .
[ G.R. No. 211962, July 06, 2020 ] JOSE ROMEO C. ESCANDOR, PETITIONER, VS. PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES, RESPONDENT. R E S O L U T I O N. LEONEN, J.: At the core of sexual harassment in the workplace, as penalized by Republic Act No. 7877, otherwise known as the Anti-Sexual Harassment Act of 1995, is abuse of power by a .In the present case, the express language of R.A. No. 9262 reflects the intent of the legislature for liberal construction as will best ensure the attainment of the object of the law according to its true intent, meaning and spirit — the protection and safety of victims of violence against women and children."'58 (Citations omitted)Scope. — The Comprehensive Agrarian Reform Law of 1989 shall cover, regardless of tenurial arrangement and commodity produced, all public and private agricultural lands, as provided in Proclamation No. 131 and Executive Order No. 229, including other lands of the public domain suitable for agriculture.
lawphil cases|lawphil net
PH0 · philippine law and jurisprudence
PH1 · philippine law
PH2 · philippine jurisprudence website
PH3 · new civil code lawphil
PH4 · lawphil search
PH5 · lawphil net
PH6 · lawphil jurisprudence
PH7 · lawphil civil code
PH8 · Iba pa